Research submissions

Reviewers spend a growing share of their time on generated submissions that read plausibly enough to demand a full read. Content-based detectors answer with inscrutable probability scores – "just trust us".

When authors draft in an editor you instrument, WriteTrack attaches the writing process to the manuscript. Editors and programme chairs triage on evidence: hours of drafting and revision, or minutes of assembly from pastes.

Document growth chart of a real writing session: document length, total input and cursor position over active writing time Document growth chart of a real writing session: document length, total input and cursor position over active writing time

Grounded signals

  • Total composition time and how deeply the author reworked the draft – not just how long the file sat open.
  • The typed-to-pasted balance across the submission, with every paste event on the record.
  • Where the rhythm changes between sections. Co-authorship is normal in research, and this shows a reviewer which hand wrote which part.
  • WriteTrack captures all of this in the author's browser. It fingerprints no devices and doesn't follow you across to other websites.
Want to see it in action?
Book a demo Get Started